The Scottish Information Commissioner - It's Public Knowledge
Tweet this page:
Text Size Icon

- Text Size Up | Down

Decision 030/2014 Mr Laurel Bush and Highland Council

Notes of Caithness Wards Business Meetings: failure to respond within statutory timescales

Reference No: 201400234
Decision Date: 17 February 2014


On 14 December 2013, Mr Bush asked Highland Council (the Council) for information from the notes of Caithness Wards Business Meetings from 16 September 2013 - 14 December 2013. The decision finds that the Council failed to comply with Mr Bush's request for review within the timescales allowed by the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA).




14 December 2013

Mr Bush made an information request to the Council.

17 December 2013

The Council responded to the information request.

23 December 2013

Mr Bush wrote to the Council requesting a review of its decision.

Mr Bush did not receive a response to his requirement for review.

1 February 2014

Mr Bush wrote to the Commissioner's Office, stating that he was dissatisfied with that failure and applying to the Commissioner for a decision in terms of section 47(1) of FOISA.

5 February 2014

The Council was notified in writing that an application had been received from Mr Bush and was invited to comment on the application.

10 February 2014

The Commissioner received submissions from the Council. Its submissions are considered below.

Commissioner's analysis and findings

1. The Council informed the Commissioner that it had carried out a review of its response to Mr Bush's request and had sent it to him on 10 February 2014. A copy of the response was provided to the Commissioner. Mr Bush confirmed he had received it.

2. Section 21(1) of FOISA gives Scottish public authorities a maximum of 20 working days following the date of receipt of the requirement to comply with a requirement for review. This is subject to qualifications which are not relevant in this case.

3. It is a matter of fact that the Council did not provide a response to Mr Bush's requirement for review within 20 working days, so the Commissioner finds that it failed to comply with section 21(1) of FOISA.

4. Given that the Council responded to Mr Bush's requirement for review on 10 February 2014, the Commissioner does not require it to take any further action in relation to Mr Bush's application.


The Commissioner finds that Highland Council (the Council) failed to comply with Part 1 of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA) in responding to the information request made by Mr Bush. In particular, the Council failed to respond to Mr Bush's requirement for review within the timescales laid down by section 21(1) of FOISA.

Given that the Council has now responded to Mr Bush's requirement for review, the Commissioner does not require the Council to take any action in response to this failure.


Should either Mr Bush or Highland Council (the Council) wish to appeal against this decision, they have the right to appeal to the Court of Session on a point of law only. The appeal must be made within 42 days after the date of intimation of this decision.

Alison Davies
Deputy Head of Enforcement
17 February 2014

PDF IconLink to PDF file of decision 030/2014 (73 kb)

Back to Top